Skip to main content

Section 1.7 Other Statistical Point Measures

Above, we have investigated statistical measures that help determine the middle and the spread of a given data set. There are however other metrics available that help describe the distribution of that data. Skewness is one of those metrics and describes any lack of symmetry of the data set's distribution and whether data is stretched out to one side or the other.

Definition 1.7.1. Skewness.

For population data, the Skewness of \(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n\) is given by

\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{\sigma^3} \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n ( x_k-\mu )^3}{n}. \end{equation*}

For sample data, the Skewness of \(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n\) is given by

\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{s^3} \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n ( x_k-\overline{x} )^3}{n}. \end{equation*}

A positive skewness indicates that the positive \((x_k - \mu)^3\) terms (likewise \((x_k - \overline{x})^3\) terms) overwhelm the negative terms. So, a positive skewness indicates that the data set is strung out to the right. Likewise, a negative skewness indicates a data set that is strung out to the left.

Data might tend to be clustered around the mean. The "kurtosis" can be used to measure how closely data resembles a "bell-shaped" collection.

Definition 1.7.2. Kurtosis.

For population data, the Kurtosis of \(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n\) is given by

\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{\sigma^4} \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n ( x_k-\mu )^4}{n}. \end{equation*}

For sample data, the Kurtosis of \(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n\) is given by

\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{s^4} \frac{\sum_{k=1}^n ( x_k-\overline{x} )^4}{n}. \end{equation*}

A kurtosis of 3 indicates that the data is perfectly bell shaped (a "normal" distribution) whereas data further away from 3 indicates data that is less bell shaped.

It should be noted that there are other possible ways to come up with interesting alternate ways to compute the kurtosis, etc. based on previous values. The ones presented above relate back to the mean and variance whose values might be more readily obtained from calculators for example.

Going back to a previous example...

Computing skewness and kurtosis by hand can often be better organized using a table. Below, notice that the \(x_k\) column would be the given data values but the other columns you could again easily compute.

Table 1.7.4. Computing data statistics by hand
\(x_k\) \(x_k^2\) \(x_k^3\) \(x_k^4\)
1 1 1 1
-1 1 -1 1
0 0 0 0
2 4 8 16
2 4 8 16
5 25 125 625
So, \(\Sigma x_k = 9\) and \(\Sigma x_k^2 = 35\) as before and so

\begin{equation*} \overline{x} = \frac{9}{6} = \frac{3}{2} \end{equation*}

and

\begin{gather*} v = \frac{25}{6} - \left ( \frac{3}{2} \right )^2 = \frac{43}{12} \approx 3.58 ,\\ s^2 = \frac{6}{5} \times v = \frac{43}{10} = 4.3,\\ \text{and so } s = \sqrt{4.3} \approx 2.07\text{.} \end{gather*}

But also, \(\Sigma x_k^3 = 141\) and \(\Sigma x_k^4 = 659\text{.}\) Use these in the formulas aboveĀ 1.7.3 to obtain skewness of

\begin{equation*} \left [ \frac{141}{6} - 3 \cdot \frac{26}{5} \cdot \frac{3}{2} - \left ( \frac{3}{2} \right )^2 \right ] / s^3 \end{equation*}

and kurtosis of

\begin{equation*} \left [ \frac{659}{6} - 4 \cdot \frac{3}{2} \cdot \frac{141}{6} + 6 \left ( \frac{3}{2} \right )^2 \cdot \frac{26}{5} - 3 \cdot \left ( \frac{3}{2} \right )^4 \right ] / s^4. \end{equation*}